Agri H1GDP Growth Down 1.7%- Urgent steps needed to boost Agri income growth: K. Ramasubba Reddy
1.The farm sector growth rate was down by 40% from 2.9% in H1 08 to 1.7% in H2 09, mainly due to the twin impact of drought and subsequent floods. The growth is estimated at 0.9 per cent in the July-September quarter. About 300 districts, which account for close to half of the country, were hit by drought, followed by floods in Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka and Maharashtra in a gap of three months
Agriculture, however, provides livelihood to over 60 per cent of the country's population.
Though drought hit summer-sown crops, the sector was able to achieve positive growth in the second quarter, as full impact of the estimated sharp fall in Kharif food grains production would only get reflected in the third quarter. The growth in agriculture will be negative in the third quarter and that will pull the growth rate for the quarter down.
According to the first advance estimates by the Agriculture Ministry, rice production is projected to fall by 17.9 per cent to 69 million tonnes during the Kharif 2009-10. The output of coarse cereals, pulses and oilseeds is estimated to fall by 19.7 per cent, 7.5 per cent and 14.8 per cent, respectively.
The Prime Minister's Economic Advisory Council had said the output of the agriculture and allied sectors will decline by two per cent in 2009-10 against growth of 1.6 per cent in the last fiscal. PTI/November 30, 2009
According to the first advance estimates by the Agriculture Ministry, rice production is projected to fall by 17.9 per cent to 69 million tonnes during the Kharif 2009-10. The output of coarse cereals, pulses and oilseeds is estimated to fall by 19.7 per cent, 7.5 per cent and 14.8 per cent, respectively.
The Prime Minister's Economic Advisory Council had said the output of the agriculture and allied sectors will decline by two per cent in 2009-10 against growth of 1.6 per cent in the last fiscal. PTI/November 30, 2009
The December quarter will show agriculture declining, because that's when the harvest shortfall will get captured," said Rajeev Malik, economist at Macquarie in Singapore,
2. Mindset of Planners and Policy Makers coming in the way of Inclusive Growth and Sectoral Equity in income distribution
However, Dr C. Rangarajan, Chairman, PMEC said industrial and services growth will be stronger in the second half and will make up for the impact of the weak monsoon on agriculture in the third quarter. BL29110
It is pretty certain now that there is likely to be negative growth to the extent of about minus -2% in agri GDP growth and over 60% of the population are dependant on agri sector.
We are unable to understand how growth in industrial and service sectors during the second half year will make up for the adverse impact of negative growth in agri GDP affecting adversely incomes of majority of the population. Will it improve incomes of 60%, agri dependant population; not directly any way. But it definitely improves the incomes of the 40% of the population earning livelihood from non-agri avocations. How will this ensure inclusive growth and equity to farmers and their dependants?
And to say that industrial and services growth will make up for the dip in agriculture is unfair to majority of the populating eking out their subsistence from agri avocation. I t bespeaks of a mindset inconsiderate of the sufferings of farmers & their families and others dependant on agriculture. Many planners and policy makers have similar mind set and with this kind of attitude inclusive growth is a mirage (Please see NOTES1&32below).
Nothing can make up for fall in farm growth in real terms. Food is first priority. Growth elsewhere cannot provide food for us. How does industry recovery help rural masses? What is urgently needed is planning and making sustained efforts to improve the incomes of agri work force, not averaging GDP growth and exulting about growth in services which gives false picture and covers up the plight of rural masses constituting 60% of the population. Due weight should be given to percentage of population depending on each sector to arrive at real Human GDP Index.
3. GDP growth H1 -7%
GDP growth rate is 7% during the first half the current fiscal, compared to GDP growth rate of 7% during the corresponding period last year. While growth rates of mining and electricity nearly doubled, growth rates of agriculture (-40%), construction (-25%), trade& hotels (-33%) declined sharply. Increase in growth rates of other sectors is around 20%.
Sectoral GDP H1 09-Growth Rates %
Sector | HY 08 % | HY 09 % |
Agri | 2.9 | 1.7 |
Mining | 4.2 | 8.7 |
Manufacturing | 5.3 | 6.3 |
Electricity, gas and water supply | 3.3 | 6.8 |
Construction | 9.0 | 6.8 |
Trade, hotels, transport and communication | 12.5 | 8.3 |
financing, ins., real est. and Business services | 6.6 | 7.9 |
Community, social and personal services | 8.5 | 9.9 |
GDP at factor cost | 7.8% | 7.0% |
Source: CSO-Computed
Quarterly GDP growth figures are given below:
4. Govt. Spending is mainly spurring GDP:
With the sharp deceleration in the growth of private final consumption expenditure (PFCE) in 2008-09, there was a shift in the contribution to growth from private consumption expenditure to government consumption expenditure.
Private Final Consumption Expenditure
In terms of GDP at market prices, the rates of PFCE at constant (1999-2000) prices during 2008-09 is estimated at 55.5 per cent, as against the corresponding rates of 57.2 per cent, respectively in 2007-08.
Government Final Consumption Expenditure
In terms of GDP at market prices, the rates of GFCE at constant (1999-2000) prices during 2008-09 is estimated at 11.1 (up by 1.3%) per cent as against the corresponding rate of 9.8 per cent in 2007-08 resulting in increase in fiscal deficit with inflationary potential. (Please see Note 3).
Pvt. and Govt. Final Consumption Expenditure
At constant Prices | Mar 08 | Sep 08 | Sep 09 |
Pvt. Final Consumption Exp | 57.2% | 56.7% | 55.2% |
Govt Final Consumption Exp | 9.8% | 8.9% | 9.9% |
Similar trend is visible in H1 09 too, less sharply though. Private final consumption expenditure (PFCE) declined from 56.7% (H1 08) to 55.2% in H1 09 while government consumption expenditure was high at 9.9% in H1 09, up by 1% from 8.9% in H1 08 resulting in increase in fiscal deficit facilitating actualization of inflationary potential.
“We shouldn’t ignore the fact that it (recovery)is still currently being driven substantially by public spending ... a recovery will only be sustained if private sector through consumption, investment and exports starts to stabilise” Subir Gokarn, Dy Governor, RBI, told. TH301109
“The central bank and the chief economic advisor are right. There is too much of purchasing power in the system and a liquidity overhang, and it makes it difficult to fight inflation.” Yoginder Alagh FE 301109
"In fact, some of the strength in the GDP data is due to a sharp increase of over 25 per cent in government spending during this quarter," CII secretary general Chandrajeet Banerjee said.
India's fiscal deficit for April to October was Rs 2.45 lakh crore, or 61
percent of the full-year target. Tax receipts were Rs 2.14 lakh crore and total expenditure was Rs 5.37 lakh crore for the first seven months of 2009/10 fiscal year. In July, the government forecast a fiscal deficit of Rs 4 lakh crore, or 6.8 percent of gross domestic product, for 2009/10. ET 301109
Comments » Govt. Spending is mainly spurring GDP
Posted by K.R.S.Reddy on 2009-11-30
From last December through March 2009, the Centre had cut excise duty by six per cent and service tax by two per cent, besides stepping up plan expenditure to generate demand, which slowed down.
From last December through March 2009, the Centre had cut excise duty by six per cent and service tax by two per cent, besides stepping up plan expenditure to generate demand, which slowed down.
With the sharp deceleration in the growth of private final consumption expenditure (PFCE) in 2008-09, there was a shift in the contribution to growth from private consumption expenditure to government consumption expenditure. . Private final consumption expenditure (PFCE) declined from 56.7% (H1 08) to 55.2% in H1 09 while government consumption expenditure was high at 9.9% in H1 09, up by 1% from 8.9% in H1 08 resulting in increase in fiscal deficit facilitating actualization of inflationary potential.
This phenomenon of swelling govt. consumption for the past one year without leading to creation of productive assets or products or services has led to inflammatory swelling of GDP powered by monetary growth, with consumer price inflation in double digits and food inflation at 15%. RBI is duty bound to act now to reduce the liquidity overhand with a view to reigning in the raging inflation. FE
NOTES:
|
No comments:
Post a Comment